On May 2, US President Donald Trump announced that his administration would revoke Harvard University's tax-exempt status.
In a post on his social media platform, Trump stated, "We are going to be taking away Harvard's Tax Exempt Status. It's what they deserve!"
This declaration follows ongoing tensions between the Trump administration and Harvard over issues related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies, as well as campus activism.
Previously, the administration had frozen over $2.2 billion in federal grants and contracts to the university after Harvard rejected demands to alter its governance, admissions, and hiring practices.
(Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates)
Harvard had responded by asserting that the removal of its tax-exempt status would jeopardise its educational mission, potentially reducing financial aid for students and hindering critical research initiatives.
Although, legal experts and academic leaders have expressed apprehension about the implications of revoking a university's tax-exempt status, citing potential challenges to academic freedom and the precedent it may set for other institutions.
Trump probes Harvard Law Review over discrimination
Separately, the Trump administration has launched a federal investigation into the Harvard Law Review over alleged discriminatory practices, further escalating its battle with the university.
The civil rights offices of the Departments of Education and Health and Human Services announced they are probing claims that the student-run journal uses race-based criteria rather than merit-based standards in selecting members and articles.
“Harvard Law Review’s article selection process appears to pick winners and losers on the basis of race, employing a spoils system in which the race of the legal scholar is as — if not more — important than the merit of the submission,” said Craig Trainor, the Education Department’s acting assistant secretary for civil rights.
“Title VI’s demands are clear: recipients of federal financial assistance may not discriminate on the basis of race, color, or national origin,” Trainor added. “No institution — no matter its pedigree, prestige, or wealth — is above the law.”
#Pahalgam Terrorist Attack
Pakistan reopens Attari-Wagah border to allow stranded citizens in India to return
Key Jammu & Kashmir reservoirs' flushing to begin soon
Air India sees Pakistan airspace ban costing it $600 mn over 12 months
This declaration follows ongoing tensions between the Trump administration and Harvard over issues related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies, as well as campus activism.
Previously, the administration had frozen over $2.2 billion in federal grants and contracts to the university after Harvard rejected demands to alter its governance, admissions, and hiring practices.
(Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates)
Harvard had responded by asserting that the removal of its tax-exempt status would jeopardise its educational mission, potentially reducing financial aid for students and hindering critical research initiatives.
Although, legal experts and academic leaders have expressed apprehension about the implications of revoking a university's tax-exempt status, citing potential challenges to academic freedom and the precedent it may set for other institutions.
Trump probes Harvard Law Review over discrimination
Separately, the Trump administration has launched a federal investigation into the Harvard Law Review over alleged discriminatory practices, further escalating its battle with the university.
The civil rights offices of the Departments of Education and Health and Human Services announced they are probing claims that the student-run journal uses race-based criteria rather than merit-based standards in selecting members and articles.
“Harvard Law Review’s article selection process appears to pick winners and losers on the basis of race, employing a spoils system in which the race of the legal scholar is as — if not more — important than the merit of the submission,” said Craig Trainor, the Education Department’s acting assistant secretary for civil rights.
“Title VI’s demands are clear: recipients of federal financial assistance may not discriminate on the basis of race, color, or national origin,” Trainor added. “No institution — no matter its pedigree, prestige, or wealth — is above the law.”
