Suspense crime, Digital Desk : Envision having a work colleague who could summarize lengthy documents for you, facilitates brainstorming exercises, or even translate complicated concepts with incredible ease. OpenAI’s CEO Sam Altman sees artificial intelligence as offering an advanced form of assistance, but this dream is being tested against a buzzsaw of litigation with The New York Times.

For Mr. Altman, having a conversation with AI should not feel like speaking with a human. Rather, he describes AI as an intelligent assistant or coworker capable of enabling new forms of productivity. His remarks suggest he sees AI as a tool to enhance humans, rather than someone who duplicates consciousness or fully replaces human functions.

This clarification comes as OpenAI faces the buzz saw of a lawsuit levied by The New York Times for infringement of copyright. The venerable publication is suing OpenAI for allegedly scraping millions of articles to train ChatGPT without granting access or compensating the company’s journalism, effectively accusing OpenAI of stealing the NYT’s content and repurposing it to fuel a commercialized AI.

OpenAI disputes the allegations. They claim that using publicly available internet resources, including news articles, to train AI models is ‘fair use.’ Moreover, OpenAI has accused the NYT of “hacking” ChatGPT, where they claim users abuse the AI by giving it prompts designed to make ChatGPT repetitively reproduce entire articles, in OpenAI’s contended fashion that isn’t representative of typical user interaction with the AI. OpenAI further stresses its attempts to collaborate with news agencies, noting that it intends to pay for content, illustrating that the lawsuit does not align with their willingness to work together.

Outside the courtroom, Altman and OpenAI are making a concerted effort to highlight AI’s utility as a strategic resource in journalism – and not as competition. They anticipate that AI developments will assist journalists in performing tasks such as research, data analysis, summarization, as well as alleviating writer’s block, rather than serving as a replacement for journalists. Therefore, AI empowers creators and newsrooms instead.

This dispute raises an essential issue for our digital society: how do we harness the opportunity provided by AI alongside established rights of design and content? With advancing AI technologies, the solutions for cases like OpenAI vs. The New York Times will greatly impact the landscape of information, creativity, and intellectual property.

Read More: OnePlus Expands Tablet Lineup: New OnePlus Pad 3 Arriving July 8th for $700