Vijay Sethupathi is an actor who enjoys immense admiration and respect. While he has made some questionable choices in his career, none are beyond redemption. However, his latest film, 'Ace', might be a moment he regrets when his children view it. One can't help but wonder what led him to participate in this mindless comedy.

In various discussions, Vijay has emphasized the importance of merging entertainment with socially relevant themes in his films.

Yet, where does 'Ace' deliver on entertainment or meaningful messages? The film feels as flat as a pancake, often stalling when the plot should progress and dragging on when it should move forward. It seems to confuse emptiness with style and creative void with improvisation.

Seeing Sethupathi caught in this nonsensical narrative serves as a reminder that even the most talented actors need to believe in their roles. It would take a miracle for any performer to find conviction in what writer-director Arumuga Kumar presents in 'Ace'.

The film features a cast of absurd characters who seem to belong in a circus, stumbling around in an attempt to be humorous and relevant. The setting is Malaysia, where Kannan (Sethupathi) meets Arivu (Yogi Babu), who serves as both a catalyst and comic relief.

The humor often comes at the expense of a character deemed unattractive, suggesting that the writers believe mocking a less-than-handsome man is entertaining. Kannan appears to be both a participant and a detached observer of this film's flawed execution.

In 'Ace', Vijay Sethupathi's character has two lackluster love interests. Kalpana (Divya Pillai) operates a restaurant, while Rukku (Rukini Vasanth) works as a salesgirl. Both women are portrayed as independent but financially struggling.

Kannan attempts to resolve their debts through poker but ultimately resorts to robbing a bank.

This plot twist highlights the depths to which the writing sinks. Watching a thoughtful actor like Vijay Sethupathi engage in such morally questionable behavior raises questions about his motivations for taking on this role. One can only hope the financial compensation was worthwhile, as nothing else seems to redeem this film.