On Friday at the Hazratpal Dargah in Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, some people broke the newly built Shilapata with the pillar of Ashoka. The controversy has arisen since then. Meanwhile, the police have registered an FIR in the attack. A case has been registered at the new police station under the FIR No. 76/2025 under the relevant sections of the Foreign (PNS) Justice Code (PNS). Section 300, 352, 191 (2) 324 (4) 196 61 (2) BNS Section (2) is said to have been filed under the Binh Act of 1971. The case has come to light after the logo is damaged. Waqf leader requested an immediate FIR to register. Officials said that the Chairman of the Waqf Board condemned the incident and that legal action would be taken against the trial of the case and that legal action would be taken against it. Jammu and Kashmir Waqf Board Chairman Tarkshan condemned Andrafi sabotage and demanded strict action against the people involved. He accused the National Convention of provoking the struggle and the party was accused of provoking people to disturb religious cleanliness and public organization. The Chief Minister raised questions about the establishment of the Ashok icon plate, while Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah said on Saturday that the Ashoka Identification plate was established in Hazratbal Dargah and that government symbols were not used in religious institutions. He said there was no example before establishing such identities within the places of worship. Speaking to media people, he said, 'I don't know whether I should have a logo in that stone or not. I do not see such a symbol used in any religious institution or at any ceremony. The Chief Minister says that "government signs are not used in religious institutions," the government's symbol is limited to government ceremonies and offices, not for places of worship. He said mosques, dargahs, temples, gurdwaras, these are not government institutions, religious institutions. He clearly stated that government signs were not used in religious institutions. Abdullah said, 'Is it mandatory for a stone to be installed in Hazratbal? Isn't the work enough? Sheikh Mohammed Abdullah presented the film to Hazratpal's Dargah. Say, did they put such a stone somewhere? Today people remember their work, while they don't even place a stone of their name there '. If this work is real, people will have identified it without any plate, he added. If there is a mistake, it should be accepted, he said. At least you have to apologize for him. What, in fact, on Friday, the locals damaged the Ashoka identity in the opening stone inside the Hazratbal Dargah. He said the locals objected to the establishment of this identity, and that this mark was against Islamic principles and not put in any dargah. Srinagar MP Aga Syed Ruhullah Mehdi described it as an attempt to promote ego in a holy place, while NC MLA Tanveer Sadiq said that establishing a statue of Numa Sadiq is contrary to Islamic principle.