Anastasia J. Casey's The Shooting Of Charlie Kirk book gets published a day before Trump ally's killing. Full controversy explained
Global Desk September 13, 2025 09:00 AM
Synopsis

Anastasia J. Casey's The Shooting Of Charlie Kirk book gets published a day before Trump ally’s killing. The book’s timing has raised questions, sparked conspiracy theories, and fueled debate about its origin, author and intent.

Anastasia J. Casey's The Shooting Of Charlie Kirk book gets published a day before Trump ally’s killing. The sudden appearance of the book has created controversy. Social media discussions and archived links have added to speculation about its publication date and content.

Anastasia J. Casey Book Appeared before Charlie Kirk Shooting

With new details emerging in the Charlie Kirk assassination case, many social media users highlighted a book listed on Amazon. The title, The Shooting of Charlie Kirk: A Comprehensive Account of the Utah Valley University Attack, the Aftermath, and America’s Response, was credited to author Anastasia J. Casey.



Screenshots shared on X showed the publication date as September 9, 2025. Kirk was shot at Utah Valley University on September 10, 2025. The one-day gap led users to suggest that the book anticipated the attack.

Also Read: What Tyler Robinson’s discord messages showed by roommate reveal – investigators confirm shooting details

The Shooting Of Charlie Kirk Book Online Reactions and Conspiracy Theories

Several users described the book’s timing as unusual. Many said the coincidence was “suspicious” and began to share theories about foreknowledge of the attack.

One user wrote that they purchased the book and found parts of it describing the setting and the incident in detail, but later sections deviated from real events. The user emphasized that the publication date showed the book was online before Kirk’s death.

Another user said Amazon had already removed the listing. They claimed the cached version and archived pages still displayed the original date.

A different post described the situation as “strange” and argued that similar cases of books appearing before major events had been seen in the past. The poster suggested that the entire shooting incident showed signs of planning.

The Shooting Of Charlie Kirk Book Publication Date Debate

The author’s identity remains unclear. Some commenters pointed out that self-published e-books on Amazon can have their dates changed. One explanation was that authors can hold a date for an unrelated project, then later replace the content after uploading a new file.



This claim led to debates about whether the September 9 listing date reflected the book’s actual release or was the result of editing and system updates.

Also Read: Tyler Robinson acted alone? Here's all about state charges, 'Bella Ciao' bullet casings in Charlie Kirk shooting incident

Amazon Removes The Shooting Of Charlie Kirk Book Listing

The original Amazon link to the book now leads to an error page. This removal has only added to speculation about its contents. Screenshots and archived versions continue to circulate online, but the platform has not issued any official explanation.


Some users asked whether the book was a prank. Others insisted the screenshots were authentic, pointing to cached pages as evidence.

No Verified Evidence of Predictive Writing

Despite the online controversy, there is no confirmed evidence that the book contained predictive details about Charlie Kirk’s shooting. Investigations into the case continue, but authorities have not linked the book to the incident.

The debate over Anastasia J. Casey’s book highlights the role of online platforms in spreading information and fueling speculation. Until more facts emerge, the connection between the book’s timing and the actual attack remains uncertain.

FAQs


Why is Anastasia J. Casey's The Shooting Of Charlie Kirk book controversial?

The book appeared online a day before Charlie Kirk’s death, sparking debate, conspiracy theories, and questions about whether its publication date reflected accurate timing.

Did Anastasia J. Casey predict the Charlie Kirk shooting?

There is no verified evidence that the book predicted the attack. Experts suggest self-publishing dates can be changed, which may explain the unusual timing.
Add ET Logo as a Reliable and Trusted News Source
Google Logo Add Now!
© Copyright @2025 LIDEA. All Rights Reserved.