New Delhi. The Karkardooma court has recently summoned a report signed by the Delhi Police Commissioner for non-compliance of its order for further investigation into three complaints of riots that took place in February 2020 in the Dayal Pul area of North East Delhi. In an FIR from Dayalpur police station, further investigation was ordered in January 2025. Now the police have filed a third supplementary chargesheet to withdraw some complaints from the earlier chargesheet. The court has taken this seriously. Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) Parveen Singh said it was clear that the entire case, which already had facts in it, was murky. This supplementary charge sheet has led to further confusion and the police have not actually bothered to follow the order.
The court has directed to comply with the order passed on January 21 this year. ASJ Singh ordered on October 16 that under the circumstances, I am bound to bring this matter to the notice of the competent police commissioner of Delhi. A copy of this order may be placed before the competent Commissioner of Police, Delhi, who will ensure that a corrective action is taken. The court directed that in view of the seriousness of the issue it is also directed that the competent police commissioner shall also ensure that a report duly signed by him or the special commissioner of the area is filed in the court on or before the date of next hearing. Earlier this order was passed after a single charge sheet was filed for the offenses of rioting etc. by a mob of two different communities. The court had remarked that the objective of these two mobs from two different communities cannot be the same. The court had remarked that no investigation was conducted into the complaints of Azad, Zaid and Sarla. However, the third supplementary charge sheet also does not state that a separate FIR was registered in connection with the complaint by Sarla and Zaid. The court also expressed strong displeasure over the lack of further investigation. So obviously instead of conducting further investigation as directed and showing the court that these two gangs were linked to a common cause, the prosecution, if I may dare so much, has tried to circumvent that order and also has not done what it has said in the supplementary charge sheet. Because today, on enquiry, it has been submitted that no FIR has been registered in respect of those complaints. Which was demanded to be withdrawn through supplementary charge sheet number three. The court said in its October 16 order. So is it possible that this supplementary chargesheet number three, which was filed with a definite undertaking and a definite purpose, was only to defeat the order of the court.
