In a shocking incident, a furious wedding photographer deleted a married couple’s photos after he was denied food and water at the ceremony. According to an Instagram post by ‘famous.pulse’, the wedding photographer unleashed his wrath on the couple’s pictures after being mistreated by the two, including ignoring his request for a break and warning that he wouldn’t be compensated if he didn’t continue clicking their photos.

The viral post suggested that the wedding photographer found himself in an untenable situation despite agreeing to click the pair’s wedding photographs at a modest $250 (approximately Rs 21,260). The photographer had requested the couple for a 20-minute break to eat and hydrate himself after slogging it out for good pictures from morning to late in the afternoon. But the groom’s appalling behaviour left him fuming as the man told the photographer, “either continue photographing or leave without compensation."

Woefully treated despite sustained work, the photographer felt disrespected and took a drastic step of deleting the pictures he had taken right in front of the groom and left the event. The man’s decision upon feeling exhausted and dishonoured has gotten the internet buzzing as the online community continues to comment on the post and debate whether his move in anger was right or a little too harsh, considering it was the couple’s biggest day.
While many came out in support of the photographer for standing up for himself after being mistreated, some argued that his response to the couple bordered on the extreme, as he deleted their photographs and caused an irredeemable loss of memories for them.

The photographer was right – treat everyone with dignity and respect. Hope the man learned a lesson," commented one user on Instagram, before another joined in and said, “We, the association of photographers, are super proud of you." A third directly questioned the groom’s nature by writing, “What kind of client doesn’t let their photographer hydrate and eat??? That sounds like abuse to me. Who wouldn’t take the pphotographer's deal"

But some took an entirely different route on the matter and deemed the photographer’s step unfair. “It’s not fare.If he had gotten his money then it’s not necessary to eat," one user said, before another wrote: “He was there to do his job. Not for partying. Many companies don’t pay for food and even offer but we take it from home or arrange it by ourself. Why to get offended and show inhumanity."