Last Updated:
Oxytocin, commonly called ‘love hormone,’ strengthens emotional connections.
For a long time, it has been assumed that men are more drawn to casual relationships, seeking physical intimacy without emotional entanglement, while women are more likely to develop deep emotional connections. The underlying reasons for these patterns are not merely social or psychological but are deeply rooted in biology.
Love has often been idealised as a mysterious and unpredictable force, but scientific research reveals that it is heavily influenced by biological mechanisms. Hormonal responses play a crucial role in shaping how men and women experience love, attachment and intimacy. Neuroscientist Tara Swart recently shared insights on Neuroglobe, shedding light on the physiological factors that drive romantic connections and emotional bonds.
Dr Swart highlighted the distinct hormonal differences between men and women during and after intimacy, emphasising their impact on emotional connections. She explained that women produce oxytocin during sexual activity, which enhances emotional attachment, while men predominantly release testosterone. However, she noted that men only experience a surge in oxytocin when they are deeply in love, which affects their capacity to form strong emotional bonds.
Oxytocin, commonly known as the “love hormone,” plays a crucial role in strengthening emotional connections. Since women naturally release this hormone after intimacy, they are more likely to associate sex with emotional closeness. On the other hand, men’s hormonal composition does not necessarily create the same attachment, making it easier for them to separate physical intimacy from emotional involvement.
Dr Swart highlighted how hormonal differences between men and women often create challenges in relationships. She explained that women are more likely to form emotional bonds through repeated intimacy due to their hormonal responses. However, she noted that men do not necessarily experience the same emotional connection, as their hormonal patterns do not naturally foster deeper attachment.
This contrast in emotional bonding often leads to misunderstandings in casual relationships. Women may expect that ongoing intimacy will strengthen emotional ties and lead to commitment, assuming that feelings will develop over time. However, from a biological perspective, a man’s emotional attachment may remain unchanged, resulting in mismatched expectations, frustration and emotional disappointment.
Recognising these biological influences can provide valuable insight into relationship dynamics, helping individuals set realistic expectations and communicate more effectively to avoid misunderstandings.
Delhi, India, India
