Thomas Tuchel’s World Cup squad for England has sparked almost as much debate as it has decisions, with several of his selections dividing opinion across the country.

English fans and pundits rarely agree, and few things highlight that better than the build-up to a major tournament. Tuchel, however, has made it clear that his choices are guided purely by results. He appears unbothered by criticism or outside noise when it comes to his selections.

Having signed a two-year contract extension in February, Tuchel’s eyes have always been firmly fixed on the 2026 World Cup. England’s progress to semi-finals and finals under recent management marked real development, and Tuchel’s reputation for seeing things through was a major part of his appeal to the Football Association.

At 35, Jordan Henderson has become something of a symbol of England’s reluctance to move on from its veteran core — a reflection of the hesitation to make bold, forward-looking choices until aging legs make the decision inevitable.

However, there is a reason both Gareth Southgate and now Tuchel have continued to value Henderson’s presence. Despite the controversy surrounding his brief Saudi Pro League spell, Henderson commands significant respect in the dressing room and serves as a leader behind the scenes.

To dismiss his selection purely on the basis of age or perceived decline would be overly simplistic. His leadership, experience, and influence can still make an important difference in a tournament environment where mentality and unity often define success.

With the expanded 26-player squad allowance, teams can now afford to include players who bring intangible contributions. Having a seasoned professional who understands tournament demands and sets standards in training could be one of England’s most valuable assets.

Supporters should not assume that the Three Lions’ recent record of deep tournament runs will automatically continue. Since 2018, England have been close to success, but every tournament starts afresh, and small margins matter.

Given the flexibility of a 26-man squad, taking Henderson makes sense. Even if he doesn’t play many minutes in the United States, Canada, and Mexico this summer, his presence could still offer England a crucial psychological edge.

There were alternative ways to involve Henderson without naming him in the 26. Tuchel and the FA have the freedom to build their broader delegation however they see fit.

Some suggested Henderson could serve as a non-playing mentor or part of the extended training group. Yet, that’s not the same as being part of the official World Cup squad. Henderson remains an active Premier League leader — not a ceremonial figurehead — and players know the difference between being around and truly being in the dressing room.

Henderson’s reputation speaks for itself. His supporters across football are numerous, and Brentford’s impressive Premier League campaign under rookie manager Keith Andrews is further proof of the midfielder’s ongoing value.

Brentford narrowly missed out on European qualification on goal difference — no small feat given the challenges of last summer — and Henderson played a key role in that effort.

Critics often highlight Adam Wharton’s omission as the biggest concern regarding Henderson’s inclusion. However, as FourFourTwo points out, these are separate discussions. Wharton’s absence is notable, but it doesn’t necessarily mean Henderson was chosen at his expense.

England’s core midfield options include Henderson, Declan Rice, Kobbie Mainoo, and Elliot Anderson. Could Wharton have been accommodated by trimming defensive numbers? Possibly. There’s even an argument he could have been selected ahead of Mainoo — and by extension, Henderson — but ultimately, these are Tuchel’s calls to make.

Tuchel believes his squad is stronger with Henderson in it. Regardless of his recent contract extension, the England manager will ultimately be judged by how this decision plays out when the World Cup concludes. Until then, Henderson’s selection remains either an inspired masterstroke, a wasted slot, or perhaps something in between.