What argument was given before the judge to send the 8 accused of theft of Ram Mandir donation to jail? After which the accused were sent on judicial remand. All the 8 accused in the Ayodhya donation theft case were produced before the VC on Monday and sent to judicial custody for 14 days. All 8 accused including Tinnu will now be presented in the court on 13th July.
All the accused were presented in the court from jail. The case file was placed before the judge and it was told that the investigation had not been completed yet. The accused should be kept in jail until the investigation is completed.
Police told the judge Case Through the file, everyone was arrested after registering an FIR on the basis of the complaint given by the Trust. The duty magistrate sent him to jail for three days. Now we need time to collect evidence, so the accused should be sent to jail.
Before being sent to jail, information was also given in the case file about the recovery made from the house of the accused during the search operation conducted on Sunday. The details of jewellery, cash and documents recovered from all the accused are being verified. In future, when necessary, the police will impose PC remand for the person in police custody, which is called PC.
Eight accused were arrested after FIR was registered on the basis of preliminary investigation by SIT. He faces charges of theft, criminal breach of trust, cheating and criminal conspiracy in connection with the alleged embezzlement of temple donations. Police are continuing the investigation of the case.
before this The Faizabad Bar Association on Monday unanimously decided not to contest the case of eight people arrested in the case of alleged embezzlement of donations given to the Ram temple in Ayodhya. This resolution was passed in the general body meeting of the association, in which former General Secretary of Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust Champat Rai, former Trust member Anil Mishra and Accounts Officer Gopal Rao were also warned to leave Ayodhya within three days, failing which the lawyers said that they would stage a blockade.
The special thing is that the Supreme Court on Monday refused to give urgent listing to a PIL demanding a court-monitored CBI investigation into the alleged embezzlement of donations. Rejecting the request for urgent hearing, the bench said there was no urgent need for out-of-turn listing and said the petition would be heard in July.
Read this also-Who is now monitoring the offerings of Ram Temple, how is the donation money being counted?
